"I baptize you for and on behalf of fta, who is dead"
Should I never tell my family about my resignation? What will they think? That I'm a prideful, evil apostate who is so completely deceived by the devil that I would voluntarily turn my back on the church. If I don't talk to them about it, they'll have no idea what courage I had to muster to leave. They'll have no idea I followed my conscience and stayed true to my integrity. They'll have no idea that this route is initially much harder than staying; that staying without questioning would have been the easy way out.
It reminds me of my great grandma, who was basically inactive, drank coffee and alcohol. Never went through the temple, was not sealed to her husband. We never talked to her about it. We just visited her and loved her. It was a non-issue. But as soon as she died, talk began up about how we're going to baptize her (also deceased) husband and get them their endowments and their sealing. And their work was done. Everyone felt that Grandma wanted it done, but she just never got around to doing it. Just couldn't get past her laziness or whatever to get out there and go to the temple.
It never occurred to anyone that maybe Grandma and Grandpa never got baptized and endowed on purpose! What if she really hated the church, or at least didn't like it? And here we go, first thing as soon as she's dead, and (probably) go against her wishes and get her temple work done. What kind of family are we? We couldn't even ask her when she was alive, why don't you get your husband baptized? Why don't you get yourself over to the temple? But, boy, when she's dead, we know exactly what's best, didn't we? We fix her salvation for her.
It's an ultimate disrespect for the dead. I never understood while I was a devout Mormon why people got so mad when Mormons baptized Holocaust survivors or other prominent people. Finally, I understand. Now I am enraged over it.
4 comments:
I'm ambivalent about the issue. For various reasons, I haven't tendered my resignation. If I ever get that chance, I really wouldn't want them to reconfirm my ordinances after I'm dead (they don't actually do all of the ordinances again if you're excommunicated or leave the church).
On the other hand, if m descendants feel the need to do it so that they can feel at peace, so be it, but I plan to make it abundantly clear that if they choose to do so, it is against my express wishes and exactly why I don't want it to happen.
My feeling about doing the "work" for the dead is, it's bid much ado about nothing. Because if we believe is Mormonism is not true than any "work" on behalf of the dead is fruitless work.
On the other hand I understand how it can make non-mormons uncomfortable as it is such a "mormon" doctrine and practice. In fact my parents told me they wrote it into their wills that they do not want the Mormon Church to do their "work" after they are dead. Of course I know that some do good Mormon will do it, and not check their will before hand.
My grandparents were very hostile to the church (not surprising considering they were never-mos living their whole lives in SLC), but that didn't stop my mom from doing my grandfather's work about 366 days after his death. (I got baptized for him, and my dad did the endowment.)
The point is that it doesn't matter what you wanted in life, they think that anyone with any sense is going to change their mind once they get a taste of that nasty spirit prison.
I don't think there's any way to avoid the posthumous dunk with Mormon relatives. I'm sure they'd do Ed Decker if they could.
---NFlanders
What makes me laugh is they'll dunk Hitler, but they refused to do two presidents of the United States. Guess which two?
1) Martin Van Buren, who famously refused to help the church with redress of grievances in Missouri.
2) James Buchanan, who sent Johnson's Army out to Utah in 1857.
I was told that in a Sunday School class when I was in high school--right out of the manual.
It makes me laugh (and a little bit mad--the mindset it reveals, though who knows, it may have been done in the intervening years for them). Yeah, Hitler's we can get over--but Van Buren and Buchanan, two totally insignificant US presidents--not so much.
Guess it all depends on whose ox gets gored.
Post a Comment